Thursday, September 24, 2009

3rd Trimester Time

Mei Mei and I have officially entered the 3rd or "money" trimester of the pregnancy. So far so good. I'm constantly impressed with how well Mei Mei has made it through the process so far. We've actually managed to get to the gym on a fairly regular basis, which I think is helping both of us out. Sometimes I have to ease Mei Mei back and remind her to take it easy, but I do think the nice light workouts are helping her with the back pain she experienced at the begining of the pregnancy. I can only imagine that new pains will come as the baby continues to grow. Currently the baby is listed as the size of very large cucumber according to our baby tracker in What to Expect when you are Expecting. I really wish they would choose size descriptors that weren't things that constantly vary in size, but so far we have only gotten fruits and vegetables. It has been fun watching the baby grow from a mustard seed to a grape to a prune to a plum to a peach to an orange and eventually on to a cucumber. Apparently the baby went from being extremely wrinkly, to nearly perfectly round to its current cylindrical shape. Hopefully, in the end it will come out baby shaped and not watermellon shaped.

In other news. Mei Mei and I very close to getting our new place. We still have some legal formalities, but if there are no hiccups, we'll be able close the deal and move in early November! We are both excited about the prospect of having our own town house, with a small private garden/patio space and garage (great for storing our bikes and doing "project"). We'll only be a couple blocks from our current place, so we will still get to enjoy the neighborhood we've come to know and love.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Streets and Sanitation

I’ve recently been made aware that the City of Chicago provides regular garbage pick up only for low rise residential buildings (which I believed are defined as 4 or less units). All larger buildings, such as most townhome developments as well as mid and high rise buildings, are required to contract out and pay for their garbage pick up through private companies. It occurs to me that this is counter to principles of urban living. Presumably, a high rise building will collect its occupant’s garbage at an accessible, centralized location, making the per capita effort to pick up and remove the waste less than the per capita cost to stop at individual single family and small condominium buildings. Currently, higher density living residents are paying taxes that fund garbage pick up for low density buildings, while they are excluded from this service. As such, the system penalizes those residents living in higher density developments, and rewards those living in the lowest density developments.

Anyhow, I’m not sure what I can do with that information. I’ve not heard anyone raise this issue before, it only occurred to me after I learned that the new townhome I’m looking to purchase is part of an association that has to pay for garbage removal. I’m going to try to find out more information about the history of this situation, and how it came to be, though I don’t really know where to begin. Perhaps I can become the new crusader for garbage equity in Chicago!

EDIT:

A reader informed me that the city does offer a "scavenger's rebate" which should atleast partially rebate the cost of the service. This is good news. However, from a city planning perspective, the easiest buildings to collect from are high rise buildings, and more generally, I think the city should be encouraging the more dense forms of development.

Friday, September 4, 2009

Los Angeles to Tokyo in only 35 Day, 2 Hours

I came across this quirk in Google Maps earlier today. Apparently if you ask for driving directions from Los Angeles to To Tokyo, it reccomends to legs of Kayaking, one from LA to Hawaii (2756 miles) and another from Hawaii to Tokyo (3879 Miles). Going in reverse, from Tokyo to LA, they actually reccomend doing it all in one big stint of 6243 Miles, skipping Hawaii.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=Los+Angeles&daddr=Tokyo&geocode=&hl=en&mra=ls&sll=34.885931,-169.277344&sspn=80.111975,178.066406&ie=UTF8&t=h&z=3

I'm not saying it wouldn't work, it just seems a little ambitious!